Nov 28, 2011, London, UK - A new report suggests that up to one fifth of global energy could be provided by biomass without damaging food production. The report reviews more than 90 global studies.
November 28, 2011 By Scott Jamieson
It has been produced by
the Technology and Policy Assessment function of the UK Energy Research
Centre (UKERC), which addresses key controversies in the energy field,
and aims to provide authoritative and accessible reports that set very
high standards for rigour and transparency.
A debate has been raging about the role biomass could play in the
future energy system: some say it could play a major role in fuelling
the planet, others argue it risks an environmental disaster. To get to
the heart of the controversy, UKERC scientists at Imperial College
London have undertaken the first systematic review of the evidence base.
The report finds that the main reason scientists disagree is that they
make different assumptions about population, diet, and land use. A
particularly important bone of contention is the speed with which
productivity improvements in food and energy crop production can be
“If we make the best use of agricultural residues, energy crops and
waste materials then getting one fifth of current global energy supply
from biomass is a reasonable ambition”, says Dr Raphael Slade, the
report’s lead author and a Research Fellow at Imperial College London.
The report finds that getting more than this is technically possible but
requires assumptions about food production and changes in diets that
look increasingly challenging, especially as people in Asia and Latin
America begin to adopt a high meat western diet as incomes rise.
“The more bio-energy you want the harder it becomes to reconcile demand
for food, energy and environmental protection” says Slade. Replacing
all fossil fuels with biomass would be equivalent to all of global
agriculture and commercial forestry combined, and would only be possible
if we can grow more food on less land.
Technical advances could be the least contentious route to increased
bio-energy production, but policy will need to encourage innovation and
investment. A renewed focus on increasing food and energy crop yields
could deliver a win-win opportunity as long as it is done without
damaging soil fertility or depleting water resources. The report
highlights the potential for policy to promote learning by encouraging
development of sustainable biomass now, rather than waiting for the
definitive answer on the ultimate potential.
“The main mistake is to think of this as all or nothing. There’s plenty
of scope for experimentation to make sure we get it right”, says Dr
Energy is an essential input into global agriculture, and the
interactions between these two areas need to be better understood. The
report stresses the need for scientists working on food and agriculture
to work more closely with bio-energy specialists to address challenges
such as water availability and environmental protection. If biomass is
required to play a major role in the future energy system the linkages
between bio-energy and food production will become too important for
either to be considered in isolation.
“Bioenergy may need to play a part in a future low carbon energy mix”,
says Dr Ausilio Bauen, Head of Bioenergy at Imperial College’s Centre
for Energy Policy and Technology. “Ensuring bio-energy, food and forests
don't compete for land won't be straightforward. But, if we use land
more productively, and make better use of available plant material, we
should be perfectly capable of producing bio-energy, feeding a growing
population, and conserving the environment all at the same time.”
Print this page