| Photo: Pacific BioEnergy
Letter to Ontario Power Generation
On April 16, 2010, WPAC sent a letter to Ontario Power Generation (OPG), objecting to the “Ontario suppliers only” provision in OPG’s request for proposals to supply wood pellets for the Atikokan Generating Station and presenting the case that it would contravene interprovincial trade law. In June, the government of Ontario responded, stating that no final decision regarding pellet use had yet been taken by the government. WPAC will continue to press on this issue.
Letter to Canadian Environment Minister
On April 30, 2010, WPAC wrote to Environment Minister Jim Prentice, urging him to consider co-firing as an effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as Canada pursues its 17% reduction commitment and asking to meet with him. Senior Environment Canada officials offered to meet with WPAC on July 7 (see Meeting with Environment Canada below).
Presentation to Canadian Senate Committee
On May 6, 2010, WPAC executive director Gordon Murray and pellet producer representative John Arsenault prepared a presentation on the benefits of co-firing that was given by Arsenault to the Agriculture and Forestry Committee of the Canadian Senate in Ottawa. The presentation was well received, and the senators asked insightful questions.
On May 12, 2010, Murray gave a presentation at the Northern Alberta Bioenergy Conference. He spoke about the pellet industry, the Canadian and Alberta coal power industry, and the benefits of co-firing. This presentation led to a meeting with Alberta’s environment minister (see Meeting with Alberta Environment Minister below).
On June 9, 2010, Murray gave a presentation at the Prince George Bioenergy Conference. He spoke to an international audience about EU government policies that have led to the growth of co-firing in Europe.
Meeting with Environment Canada
On July 7, 2010, a delegation from WPAC consisting of Murray and six pellet producer representatives met with senior Environment Canada staff in Ottawa to discuss implementation of co-firing in Canada and the proposed new regulations for coal power emissions whereby new plants and existing plants older than 45 years must meet natural gas emissions standards. Environment Canada staff acknowledged that co-firing would be an effective way to reduce emissions and potentially extend the life of older coal plants. They agreed to engage WPAC in official consultations as the new regulations are developed. They recommended that WPAC also meet with other federal departments and agencies such as Industry Canada, Natural Resources Canada, and economic development agencies.
Meeting with New Brunswick Department of Energy
On July 9, 2010, Murray and pellet producer representative Glenn Hardie met with officials of the New Brunswick Department of Energy to discuss co-firing potential in that province. The Department of Energy staff suggested that combustion tests of wood pellets are needed to demonstrate to Canadian power producers that pellets would work as well as coal. They discussed New Brunswick’s commitment to creating 400 MW of new renewable energy by 2016; they have obtained 160 MW thus far. They recommended that WPAC present a business case to NB Power, as well as join forces with the NB Woodlot Federation, which has also been promoting biomass co-firing.
Meeting with Alberta Environment Minister
On July 29, 2010, Murray and pellet producer representative John Unger met with Alberta Environment Minister Rob Renner and other officials to discuss the potential for co-firing in Alberta. The group indicated that it had already discussed co-firing with the Alberta power companies. The Alberta government is reluctant to regulate coal emissions beyond what is proposed by the federal government. However, the group noted the newly established carbon trading system in Alberta and the legal requirement for large emitters to reduce emissions by 12%. They offered to work with WPAC on developing the business case and providing advice in presenting it to the coal power producers.
Continuing and future activities
The Canadian Clean Power Coalition (CCPC) is an association of Canadian coal power companies that is working on ways to reduce coal power plant emissions. It is looking at various biomass alternatives, including hog fuel, sawdust, pellets, agricultural residues, traditional wood pellets, and torrefied wood pellets. After a discussion with WPAC about co-firing, the two organizations agreed to cooperate to develop the business case for wood pellets to present to CCPC membership.
The Centre for Electrical Industry Technical Advancement (CEATI) and the Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) are two large industry-funded, nonprofit electricity industry research organizations that have U.S., Canadian, and International power companies as members. A proposal for a cooperative partnership on co-firing and torrefaction from WPAC is being considered by the CEATI board. In addition, the BC Bioenergy Network and WPAC have negotiated an understanding that allows them to cooperate in trying to work with EPRI on torrefaction and co-firing.
Murray will be speaking on behalf of WPAC at the 7th annual Coal Symposium in Calgary in early November, 2010, which will be attended by many senior executives from the coal power companies. He will be making the case for Canadian power companies to begin co-firing. CCPC will assist in preparing the presentation.
Canadian wood pellet producers need federal and provincial governments to support their industry with effective policy similar to that in Europe. WPAC needs to convince the power industry of the business case for co-firing so that they will try it.
One only needs to look at the success of the wind power producers and the liquid renewable fuel producers. Canada’s wind power industry is growing rapidly with support from governments and power utilities. And liquid fuel producers have achieved renewable fuel standards whereby Canadian gasoline is now required to have a minimum of 5% ethanol. Those successes came from massive lobbying efforts and took time to achieve. The wood pellet industry must be prepared to do the same.